<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Circular Logic &#187; HDR</title>
	<atom:link href="http://atomicego.com/kevin/tag/hdr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://atomicego.com/kevin</link>
	<description>Where logic goes round and round and round... oh, and I will post about photography, too!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 16:59:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Lets learn HDR.</title>
		<link>http://atomicego.com/kevin/2011/07/lets-learn-hdr/</link>
		<comments>http://atomicego.com/kevin/2011/07/lets-learn-hdr/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 18:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HDR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atomicego.com/kevin/?p=248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HDR has really taken off. When I first started taking HDR photos, it was a minor niche and Trey Ratcliff had the best tutorial out there. Fast forward 3 years, and Trey STILL has the best tutorial, there are not more options than ever. I think everyone that is looking to learn HDR to read [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HDR has really taken off.  When I first started taking HDR photos, it was a minor niche and Trey Ratcliff had the <a href="http://www.stuckincustoms.com/hdr-tutorial">best tutorial</a> out there.  Fast forward 3 years, and Trey STILL has the best tutorial, there are not more options than ever.  I think everyone that is looking to learn HDR to read Trey&#8217;s tutorial.  After that, I highly recommend his book, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/World-HDR-Trey-Ratcliff/dp/0321679946/ref=nosim/amature-20">A world in HDR</a>.  The next book I recommend, and would honestly, highly recommend getting them together at once, is <a href="http://www.amazon.com/HDR-Book-Unlocking-Post-Processing-Techniques/dp/0321776895/ref=nosim/amature-20">The HDR Book</a>.  Trey goes in-depth on using photomatix, and how to make his HDR shots.  RC goes into the basics of the big three (Photoshop HDR, Photomatix, and HDR Efex Pro).  He then goes into the post-processing AFTER the HDR merge.  </p>
<p>Of the books I own on HDR, I believe these are the two very best I own.  Trey is a master at inspiration.  Inspiring you to create your own art.  RC is a master instructor.  When you bring these two books together, you get the absolute best HDR experience.  </p>
<p>As for me, I have Adobe CS 5, <a href="http://www.hdrsoft.com/">Photomatix</a> (the original software I used), and now <a href="http://www.niksoftware.com/hdrefexpro/usa/entry.php">HDR Efex Pro</a>.  Along with these three programs, I also have <a href="http://www.topazlabs.com/adjust/">Topaz Adjust</a> which brings a pseudo-HDR effect to 1 exposure shots, or creates a deeper, more surrealistic view to photos already processed in HDR.</p>
<p>Here is one of my more recent HDR shots, which was also processed with Topaz Adjust: <br />
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ryfter/5784914805/lightbox/"><img src="http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5142/5784914805_7333758f70.jpg" width="500"></a></p>
<img src="http://atomicego.com/kevin/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=248&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://atomicego.com/kevin/2011/07/lets-learn-hdr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What photography books should you read first?</title>
		<link>http://atomicego.com/kevin/2010/04/what-books-should-you-read-first/</link>
		<comments>http://atomicego.com/kevin/2010/04/what-books-should-you-read-first/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 19:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HDR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atomicego.com/kevin/?p=230</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love to read. I don&#8217;t do it enough, but I truly do. When I first get into a new hobby, or get a new interest, I have a voracious appetite for knowledge. I make a sprint to the 3rd level of learning, Conscious Competence. So, when it comes to photography, I get asked fairly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love to read.  I don&#8217;t do it enough, but I truly do.  When I first get into a new hobby, or get a new interest, I have a voracious appetite for knowledge.  I make a sprint to the 3rd level of learning, Conscious Competence.  So, when it comes to photography, I get asked fairly regularly, about what books I read/recommend.  A while back, I posted a very <a href="http://atomicego.com/kevin/2008/12/books-books-and-more-books-very-long/">long list of books</a> I have read.  That is all fine and dandy, but it is too much for the average person.  This post, is meant to boil down the books I have read, into just a few recommendations.  </p>
<p>Lets start out with <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0817463003/ref=nosim/amature-20" target="_blank">Understanding Exposure</a>.  If I could recommend JUST ONE BOOK, it is this one.  It is the one I tell people to look at, buy, and understand.  It explains the exposure triangle, gives you some basic assignments meant to make it stick, and all in all is a GREATLY way to <em>learn to see creatively</em>.</p>
<p>So, the second book (or set of books in this instance) would be <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Scott-Kelbys-Digital-Photography-Volumes/dp/0321678737/ref=nosim/amature-20">Scott Kelby&#8217;s Digital Photography books</a>.  They come as a set.  These books tell you more of WHAT to do, and a lot less of WHY you do it.  It makes it easier for a new photographer.  The reason that I suggest Understanding Exposure first, though, is so you know how to apply what you learn in these books better.  And even extrapolate what you learn into new areas.</p>
<p>The third, and last book I will talk about is <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1600591965/ref=nosim/amature-20" target="_blank">Complete Guide to High Dynamic Range Digital Photography</a>.  This is a terrific book about how to shoot and process HDR.  I do realize that there have been newer books released by Rick Sammon and Trey Ratcliff (my personal HDR inspiration), but I have not been able to pick them up.  I don&#8217;t want to blindly recommend a book, and The Complete guide is a great resource.  This is a much more specialized resource, but I get a lot of questions about it.</p>
<p>So, there you have it.  Just 3 simple books.  Well, technically Kelby&#8217;s are 3 in 1 set&#8230; but it is just 3 purchases.  I really can&#8217;t recommend these books enough.  You will NOT go wrong with them.  Especially the first two.</p>
<p>The second part of this, will be websites.  Well, websites and blogs I follow.  I have created a <a href="http://www.google.com/reader/bundle/user/17447901351149956491/bundle/Photography">photography bundle</a> of my blog and website subscriptions.  While it is not entirely comprehensive, I really like these people and between what they talk about and links to other resources you will learn a lot.  </p>
<img src="http://atomicego.com/kevin/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=230&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://atomicego.com/kevin/2010/04/what-books-should-you-read-first/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A rainbow over Boise.</title>
		<link>http://atomicego.com/kevin/2009/04/a-rainbow-over-boise/</link>
		<comments>http://atomicego.com/kevin/2009/04/a-rainbow-over-boise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HDR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[panorama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[picture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atomicego.com/kevin/?p=208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday, I was running out the door, and happened to toss my camera in the car… when it was raining? What was I thinking? Well, I was thinking I should have my camera with me, just in case… and I am VERY happy I did that! As I was driving away from the house, I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday, I was running out the door, and happened to toss my camera in the car… when it was raining?  What was I thinking?  Well, I was thinking I should have my camera with me, just in case… and I am VERY happy I did that!  As I was driving away from the house, I saw this rainbow.  I ran to this vantage point to capture it.  Here are the results.  I am VERY happy. I took a bunch of pictures, and will probably put more through post processing in the coming weeks.  Here are two standouts. -Click on the images for higher quality versions -</p>
<p>Rainbow over Boise in HDR:<br />
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ryfter/3484278079/" title="Boise downtown, framed by a rainbow. - HDR by Ryfter, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3406/3484278079_6a296d0138.jpg" width="500" height="331" alt="Boise downtown, framed by a rainbow. - HDR" /></a></p>
<p>Rainbow over Boise in Panorama:<br />
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ryfter/3484698391/" title="Under the rainbow, panorama by Ryfter, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3414/3484698391_4fc7a3b2e9.jpg" width="500" height="239" alt="Under the rainbow, panorama" /></a></p>
<img src="http://atomicego.com/kevin/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=208&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://atomicego.com/kevin/2009/04/a-rainbow-over-boise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Above the Clouds and in the Fog</title>
		<link>http://atomicego.com/kevin/2009/01/above-the-clouds-and-in-the-fog/</link>
		<comments>http://atomicego.com/kevin/2009/01/above-the-clouds-and-in-the-fog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 05:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HDR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mountains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[panorama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pictures]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atomicego.com/kevin/?p=176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tanya, Madi, and I took a trip up to Bogus today to take pictures. The cloud/fog layer dissipated somewhere between 5000 and 6000 feet opening up a great vista, of clouds. I have only seen this once before, and it is truly breathtaking. In the fog layer, moisture has been depositing on the trees and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.atomicego.com/tanya/">Tanya</a>, Madi, and I took a trip up to Bogus today to take pictures.  The cloud/fog layer dissipated somewhere between 5000 and 6000 feet opening up a great vista, of clouds.  I have only seen this once before, and it is truly breathtaking.  In the fog layer, moisture has been depositing on the trees and bushes, creating an amazing looking frost covering everything.  Here are the pictures I really liked, from today.  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ryfter/3208966536/" title="Above the Cloud - Panorama by Ryfter, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3085/3208966536_48696ce44b.jpg" width="500" height="175" alt="Above the Cloud - Panorama" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ryfter/3207846093/" title="Blue Sky and Fog by Ryfter, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3436/3207846093_ef80610490.jpg" width="333" height="500" alt="Blue Sky and Fog" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ryfter/3208119209/" title="Above The Clouds by Ryfter, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3126/3208119209_aed9dda2fb.jpg" width="500" height="339" alt="Above The Clouds" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ryfter/3208026835/" title="Above the Clouds - HDR by Ryfter, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3534/3208026835_fc081cbf58.jpg" width="500" height="329" alt="Above the Clouds - HDR" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ryfter/3208026929/" title="Above the Clouds 2 - HDR by Ryfter, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3426/3208026929_3a1e63e63c.jpg" width="362" height="500" alt="Above the Clouds 2 - HDR" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ryfter/3208874390/" title="Trees Covered in Frost - HDR by Ryfter, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3536/3208874390_bdd76f8642.jpg" width="500" height="333" alt="Trees Covered in Frost - HDR" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ryfter/3208692814/" title="Trees Covered in Frost by Ryfter, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3087/3208692814_cd594e2597.jpg" width="500" height="333" alt="Trees Covered in Frost" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ryfter/3208693142/" title="Tree Covered in Frost by Ryfter, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3338/3208693142_841eab3c89.jpg" width="345" height="500" alt="Tree Covered in Frost" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ryfter/3207845631/" title="Macro picture of frost on a branch. by Ryfter, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3342/3207845631_3c0b212b22.jpg" width="500" height="335" alt="Macro picture of frost on a branch." /></a></p>
<img src="http://atomicego.com/kevin/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=176&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://atomicego.com/kevin/2009/01/above-the-clouds-and-in-the-fog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New filter that my giflriend found &#8211; Topaz Adjust.</title>
		<link>http://atomicego.com/kevin/2009/01/128/</link>
		<comments>http://atomicego.com/kevin/2009/01/128/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 21:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HDR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high dynamic range]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[landscape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pictures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[post processing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[topaz adjust]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atomicego.com/kevin/?p=128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My girlfriend pointed met to a new Photoshop plugin called Topaz Adjust. It can take a picture and process it very similar to HDR – High Dynamic Range. It took some pictures that I had taken that looked ok to good, and made them look quite a bit better. Examples of Topaz Adjust: Here is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My <a href=http://atomicego.com/tanya>girlfriend</a> pointed met to a new Photoshop plugin called <a href=http://www.topazlabs.com/topazlabs/03products/topaz_adjust/>Topaz Adjust</a>.  It can take a picture and process it very similar to <a href=http://www.flickr.com/photos/ryfter/sets/72157606562440072/>HDR – High Dynamic Range</a>.  It took some pictures that I had taken that looked ok to good, and made them look quite a bit better.  </p>
<p><b>Examples of Topaz Adjust:</b></p>
<p>Here is a good example.  This picture, is the original: </p>
<div align="center"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ryfter/3158410085/" title="Owyhee Mountains - Idaho by Ryfter, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3256/3158410085_5abdba7549_m.jpg" width="240" height="79" alt="Owyhee Mountains - Idaho" /></a></div>
<p>I then processed it with Topaz Adjust: </p>
<div align="center"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ryfter/3181843074/" title="Sunshine over the Owyhees. by Ryfter, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3111/3181843074_bd1a35e69b_m.jpg" width="240" height="79" alt="Sunshine over the Owyhees." /></a></div>
<p>This is the HDR version of that picture: </p>
<div align="center"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ryfter/3158284924/" title="HDR photo of the Owyhee Mountains by Ryfter, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3227/3158284924_775653eef8_m.jpg" width="240" height="134" alt="HDR photo of the Owyhee Mountains" /></a></div>
<p><b>Another Example</b></p>
<p>This was the original: </p>
<div align="center"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ryfter/3168082619/" title="River bend by Ryfter, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1006/3168082619_19f9db2e13_m.jpg" width="240" height="182" alt="River bend" /></a></div>
<p>Here it is processed with Topaz Adjust:</p>
<div align="center"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ryfter/3181006863/" title="River bend - redone by Ryfter, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3115/3181006863_5b392ae5fd_m.jpg" width="240" height="182" alt="River bend - redone" /></a></div>
<img src="http://atomicego.com/kevin/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=128&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://atomicego.com/kevin/2009/01/128/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Books, Books, and MORE BOOKS! (Very Long)</title>
		<link>http://atomicego.com/kevin/2008/12/books-books-and-more-books-very-long/</link>
		<comments>http://atomicego.com/kevin/2008/12/books-books-and-more-books-very-long/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 01:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[art wolfe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bryan peterson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HDR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high dynamic range]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scott kelby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[travels to the edge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atomicego.com/kevin/?p=41</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a forum I frequent, someone asked about what books we suggest for learning photography. After listing all of my books, and giving a quick critique, I thought it would be good to add here, as well. So, without further ado, here are the books I have and recommend, as well as a few that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a forum I frequent, someone asked about what books we suggest for learning photography. After listing all of my books, and giving a quick critique, I thought it would be good to add here, as well. So, without further ado, here are the books I have and recommend, as well as a few that I have my eye on, and would love to read. These books will be digital centric. Not film.</p>
<p>So, for the first book&#8230; this is a very important position. Three books jump out at me, at once. I guess I will start from the more basic, to more advanced.</p>
<p>For the absolute beginner, I would have to go with <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0817435522/ref=nosim/amature-20" target="_blank">BetterPhoto Guide to Digital Photography</a>. This is a good book for people with digital cameras. Be it point and shoot, or SLR. There is a lot in here that will be covered later, but it is a great primer. Very easy to read.</p>
<p>For the next one, it is actually a 2 book set. I would recommend <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0321604032/ref=nosim/amature-20" target="_blank">Scott Kelby&#8217;s Digital Photography Boxed Set</a>. When I bought it, it was 2 separate books. Now, you can get a single gift set. The books complement each other very well. This is a more basic book, with advanced sections. That is not quite right. He tends to tell you what to do, and less HOW to do it. The end sections I would love to see him come out with, as flash cards, that are weather resistant. Once again, it is more of, do this&#8230; and this is how you do it. Very cool concept. Scott Kelby is pretty much a god, when it comes to digital imaging. He also has a GREAT sense of humor, which makes reading his books excessively easy.</p>
<p>For the next book, I would recommend, I would have to go to <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0817463003/ref=nosim/amature-20" target="_blank">Understanding Exposure</a>. This is one of the more popular books that I have seen. Amazon is showing 484 customer reviews at 4.5 stars. I think that alone, is a testament to this book. I find Bryan Peterson books, easy to read. This book goes in depth about creating &#8220;artistically correct&#8221; exposures. You can create several pictures of the same object, using different exposures. They are all technically correct, but there is only one artistically correct exposure, for you. It is a very interesting concept, and something that he follows through several books. He also goes in depth about the interaction of Aperture, ISO, and Shutter Speed. This a very KEY aspect to photography.</p>
<p>Those are three GREAT books, to get started with, learning photography. I recommend them all.</p>
<p>One other book, that is good in its own right, but I don&#8217;t think it is quite up there with the other three, is another book by Bryan Peterson. This one is called <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0817437967/ref=nosim/amature-20" target="_blank">Understanding Digital Photography</a>. The reason I show some hesitation on this book, is that while I really like it&#8230; some of the advice seems to be a little off. For one, I would not recommend blowing out your sensor with compressed air. Just a few minor issues, in a technically good book. Once again, Bryan Peterson is a creative photographer, and you can see his love for the medium shine through. His pictures that go along with the concepts are spot on. This one is pretty much interchangeable with the first book on my list. I think the Betterphoto book, is just a touch better on the beginner book, though.</p>
<p>The next book is my final Bryan Peterson book. This one is <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0817463003/ref=nosim/amature-20" target="_blank">Learning to See Creatively</a>. Learning to See Creatively was the first photography book I purchased. I was able to read it all, cover to cover, in one evening. It is not difficult to digest. Lots of pictures. This one, more than all of my other books, really OPENED my eyes to the creative side of photography. (I am kind of a tech-head, so come to photography with a VERY tech, look. Not as creative). This book will always hold a special place in my heart. It is also the book that pushed me into getting my first dSLR camera, since all of the sudden my Point and Shoot was holding me back.</p>
<p>Now, from here on out, I am going to be talking about books that speak to my favorite aspects of photography.</p>
<p>My first &#8220;love&#8221; in photography, would have to be macro photography. I love doing it. I question if I have the patience at times to do it WELL, but I truly do love it. So, I have picked up two books on the subject. The first one, is <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1861085303/ref=nosim/amature-20" target="_blank">Digital Macro Photography</a>. This is done by a younger gentleman. I think he needs to refine his writing style a bit, but he does a good job of explaining concepts. He has some truly outstanding pictures to illustrate his points, as well.</p>
<p>The next book that I have, is <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0817440526/ref=nosim/amature-20" target="_blank">John Shaw&#8217;s Closeups in Nature</a>. I know that John Shaw is one of the top writers in photography, but I just have some troubles recommending his books. The pictures themselves are QUITE stunning, but I am not a big fan of his writing style, and these books are a DEFINITE throw-back to the film era where he talks about film selection for different pictures. Just not my bag of tea. And quite honestly, god I am glad I don&#8217;t have to shoot film!</p>
<p>From there, I will take you into another aspect of photography I love, HDR, or High Dynamic Range photography.</p>
<p>The first book I want to talk about is <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1600591965/ref=nosim/amature-20" target="_blank">Complete Guide to High Dynamic Range Digital Photography</a>. I think the title is misleading. I have another HDR book, that is much more complete. I would say this would be better called HDR for everyone that wants to learn how to shoot HDR. <img src='http://atomicego.com/kevin/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  This is really a great book. Awesome examples, and several different ways of looking at things. HDR made easy. I REALLY like this book.</p>
<p>The second HDR book in my collection is <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1933952059/ref=nosim/amature-20" target="_blank">The HDRI Handbook</a>. This one really does fall under the &#8220;complete&#8221; category, more so than the title above. This one is VERY complete. It is more complete than what I have been really interested in, though. There is some VERY good information on where HDR came from, and a LOT more technical background. I found it a bit dry to read though. I know this is a bit rough of a review, but I want to temper it by saying that this book is VERY good. VERY technical, and definitely a great addition to my library.</p>
<p>This last book is one that I am still not 100% sure about. It is called <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/158180766X/ref=nosim/amature-20" target="_blank">The Photo Idea Index</a>. This book gives you ideas on how to shoot pictures. TONS of different ideas, and pictures to back them up. It doesn&#8217;t seem to be technically, that great. But, it is GOOD when your brain is in a slump. I REALLY like the &#8220;flash cards&#8221; in the back of Scott Kelby&#8217;s two books, and I almost feel that this BOOK is a lot like those. I have a hard time recommending this book, because it is odd. It fits in a weird spot, though, I wouldn&#8217;t give it up, and am happy I own it.</p>
<p>So, those are books on Photography. I have a few additional books that go along with photography. These are books on post processing. The first one I got, was <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0596514441/ref=nosim/amature-20" target="_blank">Photoshop Elements 6 Missing Manual</a>. A bit dry, but a GREAT manual. I had it get wet, and ruined, so I have not read as much of it, as I would have liked. The other Adobe Elements 6 book I have is <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0321524640/ref=nosim/amature-20" target="_blank">Photoshop Elements 6 for Digital Photographers</a>. This is another Scott Kelby book. This one TOO was ruined in the great flood&#8230; but I have re-purchased it. It is not as technically complete as the missing manual, but it more than makes up for it by being REALLY easy to read, and has great illustrations.</p>
<p>My latest book on post processing, is another Scott Kelby Book. It is <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0321555562/ref=nosim/amature-20" target="_blank">Lightroom 2.0 for Digital Photographers</a>. This book is VERY much like the Photoshop Elements book in look and feel. It is a must-have book for any LR2.0 user.</p>
<p>Once I am able to get some more books, I have several on my list. They range from another Bryan Peterson book, kind of Understanding Exposure 2, to more specialized books on low-light, portraits, landscapes. What I am planning on getting, coming up are:<br />
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0817463011/ref=nosim/amature-20" target="_blank">Understanding shutter speed</a><br />
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0817453911/ref=nosim/amature-20" target="_blank">Beyond Portraiture</a><br />
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0817432418/ref=nosim/amature-20" target="_blank">Night and Low Light Photography</a><br />
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0817427198/ref=nosim/amature-20" target="_blank">Understanding Close-Up Photography</a><br />
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0715329405/ref=nosim/amature-20" target="_blank">Digital SLR Expert Landscapes</a><br />
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1933952105/ref=nosim/amature-20" target="_blank">Low Budget Shooting</a><br />
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1902538463/ref=nosim/amature-20" target="_blank">Working with Light</a><br />
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0321544080/ref=nosim/amature-20" target="_blank">The moment it clicks</a></p>
<p>I think it would be difficult to really read a book, and look at someone else&#8217;s photographs, and not come out with further insights in how to take pictures, or how to see the world, in that slightly different way. How to see light, even more so than the scene. I think that is what these books help you to do. Garner further understanding of light, and photography.</p>
<p>Finally, books are fine and all, but if you want a great photographic experience, check out <a href="http://www.travelstotheedge.com/">Art Wolfe&#8217;s Travels to the Edge</a> on your local PBS station. Getting someone like him to talk about photography, and those items that surround it, and then seeing what they produce is quite an experience. It is available to snag on your DVR, or pick up on DVD.</p>
<p>If you have any other suggestions, please feel free to add some comments.</p>
<img src="http://atomicego.com/kevin/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=41&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://atomicego.com/kevin/2008/12/books-books-and-more-books-very-long/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s been a while, more High Dynamic Range (HDR)</title>
		<link>http://atomicego.com/kevin/2008/09/its-been-a-while-more-high-dynamic-range-hdr/</link>
		<comments>http://atomicego.com/kevin/2008/09/its-been-a-while-more-high-dynamic-range-hdr/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 01:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HDR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high dynamic range]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[landscape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pictures]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atomicego.com/kevin/?p=33</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This poor blog is really looking neglected. I have a post I want to do about a couple of photo shoots I have been wanting to do, but I have not gotten around to them yet. So, instead, I am going to show off some HDR, instead. Honestly, I LOVE HDR. I like the saturation [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This poor blog is really looking neglected.  I have a post I want to do about a couple of photo shoots I have been wanting to do, but I have not gotten around to them yet.  So, instead, I am going to show off some HDR, instead.  Honestly, I LOVE HDR.  I like the saturation affects, the most.  You can get such a wide range of color, in the simplest  subject, like this bottle, found by the side of the road:</p>
<p align="center"><a title="HDR picture of a bottle found on the roadside. by Ryfter, on Flickr" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ryfter/2691161627/"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2221/2691161627_1b6b348169_m.jpg" alt="HDR picture of a bottle found on the roadside." width="240" height="160" /></a></p>
<p>I love the depth of color.  When looking at the properly exposed photo, the bottle is VERY flat and lifeless.  The addition of HDR, in this photo, adds a depth that is just missing from conventional photography.</p>
<p>Next up, is one of my new favorites.  We were taking a trip to my cousin’s wedding in California, when my 3 year old daughter pipes up and tells us that she has to go potty.  There was NOTHING around.  This was a VERY desolate piece of road in Oregon, so we pull over on the side of the road in a turnout.  She tries to pull her pants down, and go, but has trouble going without a toilet.  But, we took advantage of the stop to walk around a bit.  I took advantage of it, to take some great shots.   The sky was very pretty, with those feathery clouds.  I put my circular polarizer on, to get some nice pop to the sky.  I then set my camera to Auto Exposure Bracketing.  I set the camera on my car, and fired off 3 pictures quickly, trying to keep shaking to a minimum.  This was a VERY simple shot to do.  Just loaded it in photomatix, adjusted  a few sliders, until I was happy, and rendered it.  I then cut off a bit of the bottom of the picture, since you could see a piece of my hood in there.  That was all the processing this required.  I love how it looks:</p>
<p align="center"><a title="Desert Vista in HDR by Ryfter, on Flickr" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ryfter/2811931759/"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3100/2811931759_1e3a0a905b_m.jpg" alt="Desert Vista in HDR" width="240" height="151" /></a></p>
<p>I just love how HDR can take a mundane photo and it then just pops out at you, when processed correctly.</p>
<img src="http://atomicego.com/kevin/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=33&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://atomicego.com/kevin/2008/09/its-been-a-while-more-high-dynamic-range-hdr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>High Dynamic Range photography</title>
		<link>http://atomicego.com/kevin/2008/06/high-dynamic-range-photography/</link>
		<comments>http://atomicego.com/kevin/2008/06/high-dynamic-range-photography/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 01:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HDR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high dynamic range]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pictures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rose]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atomicego.com/kevin/?p=25</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ok, I admit it. When it comes to computers, I am a GEEK. I love computers, I love twiddling with them&#8230; and I love playing with software. I think that is kind of why photography speaks to me. I am not an artist. God, I don&#8217;t have an artistic bone in my body. Luckily, for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Ok, I admit it. When it comes to computers, I am a GEEK. I love computers, I love twiddling with them&#8230; and I love playing with software. I think that is kind of why photography speaks to me. I am not an artist. God, I don&#8217;t have an artistic bone in my body. Luckily, for me, I can at least SEE art, and the camera allows me to capture it.</p>
<p>If you have spent much time at all, with photography, you will know we have something called the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_of_thirds">Rule of Thirds</a>. With the cameras themselves, we have THREE distinct settings, used to get the proper lighting: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Film_speed">ISO</a>, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shutter_speed">Shutter Speed</a>, and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fstop">apature</a>. We take into account the fstop for depth of field. We use technology, to capture art. There are artists out there, that create art, then use a camera to capture it. I will freely admit, I am no where CLOSE to that&#8230; but I do like the techy aspect of photography. I have learned how to use ISO to squeeze out a bit better shot, but I realize I am giving up a &#8220;clean&#8221; image. (due to more &#8220;grain&#8221; or <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image_noise">noise</a>). I have figured out how to use neutral density filters to reduce the light going into my camera, so I can take a longer exposure of a water, to make it look silky. I think I have come a long ways. While I used to actively think about these things, now, it is becoming second nature to a degree. (let’s face it, I have only had my dSLR for just under 2 months, and you can only learn SO much in that time&#8230;)</p>
<p>So, for my NEXT geeky move, into photography. It is HDR, or <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_dynamic_range_imaging">High Dynamic Range</a> imaging. This stuff is pretty cool. There are <a href="http://www.flickr.com/groups/hdr/">flickr groups</a> dedicated to it. There is software designed for it (<a href="http://www.hdrsoft.com/">Photomatix</a> and <a href="http://www.mediachance.com/hdri/index.html">High dynamic Photo</a>) and there seems to be a big buzz about it. It is very cool. While our eyes can see something like 11 &#8220;fstops&#8221; of range, a picture can pull up between 5 and 7. (I have seen both of those numbers listed). So, our eyes can see a LOT more of a scene than a camera. We can see INTO shadows, and pull out detail, while at the same time, looking over at a bright subject, and seeing detail in there. With a camera, one or both would be blown out, or underexposed, to get a picture. Well, with HDR, we take a series of pictures, and blend them into one. This creates some VERY cool effects, and makes for some very rich pictures. (Peruse the HDR flickr group I linked to above, to see just how cool).</p>
<p>For some reason, my geeky friends love this, as do I. It is, on its surface, very simple. I set my camera to auto-bracket. I fire 1 shot at -1 exposure, 1 at the proper exposure and then one more at +1 exposure. Then, I use one of those two softwares above, to merge it into one picture. I know it is FAR more complicated than that, since Photomatix has 2 settings, one is HDR, and one is blending. To me, they are one in the same (at this point in my journey of knowledge), but, since both are options, I know they are ultimately different.<br />
If you are curious about the quality of the software I list, from what I understand, Photomatix is the most popular piece of software. It is supposed to be able to create the most natural looking pictures. While High Dynamic Photo creates good photos as well… its user-interface is MILES better than Photomatix’s. Ultimately, it depends on what you care more about. Oh, and Photomatix is about double the price of HDP. (as an aside, I bought Photomatix today, to start playing with this stuff, and later in the day, learned about HDP. I doubt I would have gone for Photomatix, because of the price, but if you search well with Google, you CAN find a 15% discount on Photomatix, bringing the price down some)</p></div>
<div>Now, lets look at some pictures:</div>
<p><a title="Rose using HDR by Ryfter, on Flickr" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ryfter/2543306134/"><img style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; CURSOR: hand; TEXT-ALIGN: center" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3077/2543306134_ff61f8c807_m.jpg" alt="Rose processed with HDR, high saturation" width="240" height="156" /></a></p>
<p align="center"><span style="font-size:78%;">This one was processed with High Dynamic Photo. I had 3 exposures of -1.33/0/+1.33. </span></p>
<p align="center"><span style="font-size:78%;"><a title="Closeup of a rose processed with HDR. by Ryfter, on Flickr" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ryfter/2542753511/"><img style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; CURSOR: hand; TEXT-ALIGN: center" src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2022/2542753511_cf868e0e4f_m.jpg" alt="Macro of a Rose, processed with HDR" width="240" height="160" /></a>This one was processed with Photomatix. I had 3 exposures of -1.33/0/+1.33. </span></p>
<p><a title="A bunch of roses, processed with HDR by Ryfter, on Flickr" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ryfter/2543528552/"><img style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; CURSOR: hand; TEXT-ALIGN: center" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3255/2543528552_bb41bbd7c1_m.jpg" alt="Rose bush" width="160" height="240" /></a></p>
<p align="center"><span style="font-size:78%;">This one was processed with Photomatix. I had 3 exposures of -1.33/0/+1.33. </span></p>
<p>These are a little different. They were blended, but based on one RAW file. I set one to +1 Exposure and one to -1 exposure saved the 2 files, and then combined them. It was more to test it out. The top one, is &#8220;blended&#8221; the bottom one was combined using HDR.</p>
<p align="center"><a title="Lucky Peak Rooster Tail - Blended by Ryfter, on Flickr" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ryfter/2543014428/"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3052/2543014428_88b0cf8e7a_m.jpg" alt="Lucky Peak Rooster Tail - Blended" width="240" height="160" /></a></p>
<p align="center"><a title="Lucky Peak Rooster Tail - HDR by Ryfter, on Flickr" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ryfter/2542189719/"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3153/2542189719_728e184e74_m.jpg" alt="Lucky Peak Rooster Tail - HDR" width="240" height="160" /></a></p>
<img src="http://atomicego.com/kevin/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=25&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://atomicego.com/kevin/2008/06/high-dynamic-range-photography/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

